US
Education Update
Issue
13, March 2002
Contents
School Choice
New Study
A major new study
from the RAND Corporation, an independent research organsation based in
California (www.rand.org/education/),
looks at the evidence of the effectiveness of charter schools and school
vouchers (charter schools are privately run public schools, free from
many of the regulations of public schools; voucher programmes provide
children in "failing" schools with public funds - vouchers -
to attend a private school).
The RAND study is
an analysis of many recent studies. It examines academic achievement as
well as racial and socio-economic integration in charter schools and voucher
programmes. It acknowledges that much of the evidence raises more questions
than it answers such as why African-American students seem to perform
better in voucher programmes yet Hispanic students do not (see Education
Update 3, item 5 plus a report from Mathematica Policy Research Inc. "NYC
School Choice" at: www.mathematica-mpr.com/).
Critics of charters and vouchers feel that they are a distraction from
the important topic of improving public schools which should emphasise
teacher quality, smaller classes, and all day Kindergarten for low-income
pupils. Supporters say giving parents choice, thus ensuring competition,
is the only way to make the public schools improve. The report concludes
that while the jury is out on the long term effects of these school choice
options, they are worthwhile continuing and watching closely. "Rhetoric
vs. Reality: What We Know and What We Need to Know About Vouchers and
Charter Schools", is available online at: www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR1118/
Cleveland Voucher
Case
Hailed as the biggest
education case to be argued since the hearings on segregation in the 1950s,
the US Supreme Court will hear arguments on whether the voucher programme
in Cleveland is in violation of the US Constitution. The Cleveland Scholarship
and Tutoring Program began in 1995 in response to a public school system
in crisis. The programme gives tuition vouchers of up to $2,250 to approximately
4,200 children from low-income families to attend private school. Statistics
show that 99% of the pupils attend a religious school (usually Roman Catholic)
thus raising allegations that public monies are being used for religious
schools, violating the Constitution's separation of church and state.
(Catholic schools charge low tuition - the vouchers would not cover the
tuition required at most other private schools). Supporters of vouchers
say it is constitutional as it is parents, not the government, who opt
to use vouchers at religious schools which are just part of the school
choice options in Cleveland. Opponents say it is unconstitutional to use
taxpayers' money to pay for sectarian schooling, plus 33% of pupils receiving
vouchers were already attending private or parochial schools (the state
therefore is paying for pupils who would not have been in the public school
system anyway). Critics also point to evidence that the number of white
students receiving vouchers is disproportionately high in a predominantly
black public school system. The Supreme Court is expected to make its
decision in early July.
For more information:
www.rethinkingschools.org
- This Urban Educational Journal has been following the voucher movement
from the beginning and provides commentary and a series of articles
www.edexcellence.net
- The Thomas B Fordham Foundation is pro-vouchers and provides articles
on the subject
www.edweek.org
- Education Week provides an overview of vouchers. Click on "Hot
Topics", then "Vouchers"
(Sources: Education
Week, New York Times, Public Education Network online)
Privatisation Experiment
in Philadelphia Schools
The Philadelphia school
district, the country's eighth largest with 264 schools and 210,000 pupils,
passed into the hands of the State of Pennsylvania in December 2001. No-one
seems to disagree that the embattled district is in dire need of academic
and fiscal help. However, the method of intervention has been the cause
of heated debate and controversy. The most controversial aspect is the
involvement of Edison Schools Inc, the largest for-profit private manager
of public schools. Hired as a consultant to the district, it is likely
that Edison will manage Philadelphia's worst-performing schools thus making
the district the largest experiment in educational privatisation in the
country. Final decisions on the running of the Philadelphia school district
will be made next month. Fourteen states have the authority to intervene
in schools judged to be "failing" based on the school's accountability
system. States use reconstitution (ie taking over or closing the school
or replacing all or any of the staff) as a method of dealing with their
worst performing schools. The threat of reconstitution by the state can
lead districts to intervene where there are early signs of trouble. The
Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) is currently targetting fourteen
of its lowest-performing schools for extra attention to prevent a possible
state takeover. The schools, populated by poor students whose English
is a second language, are staffed by mostly unqualified teachers. LAUSD
is offering additional training for teachers and administrators in the
schools.
Please click here
for background on Edison
Schools Inc.
Federal Report
Calls for Earlier Reading Comprehension Skills
A federal report suggests
children need reading comprehension strategies to be introduced in earlier
grades. According to the report, the push to improve early reading via
skills-based instruction, sometimes delaying reading comprehension skills
until 4th grade (10/11 years old), could undermine literacy goals. The
report calls for more research on comprehension skills, methods for nurturing
good readers and how teachers assess reading proficiency. "Reading
for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension"
was produced by the RAND Corp. under a contract with the Department of
Education's Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI).
It can be read at:www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR1465/
Teenage Technology
Entrepreneurs in Massachusetts
Teenagers at eight
high schools in Massachusetts can combine technology/ business training
and community service with the support of a programme called Youth Technology
Entrepreneurs (YTE). This four-year old non-profit organisation, which
works with the state Department of Education and several private companies,
was born from simple necessity according to its founder Michael Goldstein.
Some Massachusetts school districts had purchased computers only to find
they could not afford the maintenance, support and training necessary
to maximise the benefits of the new technology. YTE provides the means
for schools to train and make use of their own students. The students,
mostly from low-income neighbourhoods, benefit from a curriculum which
encourages the pursuit of further education, an environment of cooperation
(where more experienced students teach help others), and a programme of
outreach to the community.
A full report on YTE,
by Terri Evans of the British Consulate-General Boston, can be read at
YTE Report.doc.
DC Services for
At-Risk Youth
The District of Columbia
has introduced several initiatives to improve services for its youth (who
have low academic achievement and one of the highest juvenile violent
death rates in the nation). The initiatives focus on improving after school
activities and establishing a collaboration of service-providers who share
common goals. One such initiative is the Children and Youth Investment
Partnership (CYIP) which seeks to improve the quality and quantity of
youth services in the District.
To read more, please
see: "Creating a Seamless Web of Services for Youth:
The DC Children and Youth Investment Partnership" www.urban.org/education/DC-CYIP.html#execsum
published by the Urban Institute, an economic and social policy research
organisation
National Commission
on Service Learning: Final Report
In 2000, the W K Kellogg
Foundation launched the National Commission on Service Learning chaired
by US Senator John Glenn of Ohio and comprising representatives from education,
government, business, and citizen- advocacy groups. The mission of the
committee was to urge schools to make service learning (volunteering linked
to academic credit) a part of every child's curriculum. The Commission
spent 2001 researching best practice and making recommendations on how
to include more students in service learning. The final report of the
Commission is now available online. It concludes that "linking curriculum
and community service builds better students and better citizens".
For more details,
please see: www.servicelearningcommission.org/pressrel.html
For further information on Kellogg's initiatives, please see: www.learningindeed.org
Non-Traditional
Routes to Teaching
Pathways to Teaching
Careers Program
For over six years
the Urban Institute, an economic and social policy research organisation,
has studied Pathways to Teaching Careers Program. Funded by the Wallace-Reader's
Digest Fund, it encourages non-traditional candidates into teaching such
as paraprofessionals or returning Peace Corps volunteers. The programme
works closely with colleges and universities in partnership with local
school districts. Its goals are to increase the retention rates of new
teachers, increase the pool of minority teachers (the racial imbalance
between pupils and teachers is growing), and a secondary goal is to get
more men to teach. An analysis of the data from the programme shows an
increase in the teaching force (and higher retention after three years
than regular novice teachers); an increase in the number of minority teachers
recruited; Pathways teachers perceived by their peers as more effective
teachers than regular novices; effective recruitment to "high-need"
schools with new teachers prepared to meet their needs (having worked
in close partnership with the local school district. Overall, the non-traditional
programme is viewed as a successful (affordable and effective) way to
increase the supply of teachers.
To read more of the
study "Absence Unexcused: Ending Teacher Shortages in High-Need Areas"
, please see: www.urban.org/education/absence-unexcused.html
The New Teacher
Project
Based in New York,
the New Teacher Project enjoys high profile supporters such as First Lady
Laura Bush and Senator Hillary Clinton. The Project recruits and trains
middle-aged professionals to become teachers. It is part of the Department
of Education's Transition to Teaching which is set to receive $35 million
in 2002 and almost $40 million next year. The Project funds "Teaching
Fellowship" programmes across the nation. Each programme is unique
although all provide their recruits with a few weeks of training before
they enter the classroom. New teachers then work towards their teaching
license while teaching.
For more information,
please see: www.tntp.org
Two Policy Briefs
on Recruiting and Retaining Teachers
The Southeast Center
for Teaching Quality, based at the University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill, recently released a policy brief suggesting that more than money
will be needed to attract and retain teachers in schools facing recruitment
difficulties. It recommends non-traditional routes into teaching; providing
scholarships to retrain teachers; identifying skilled teachers to lead
reform efforts.
The brief, "Recruiting
Teachers for Hard-to-Staff Schools: Solutions for the Southeast and the
Nation" can be read, along with "Recruitment and Retention Strategies
in a Regional and National Context" at www.teachingquality.org/
Policy Dialogue
on Lifelong Learning: 7 - 8 February 2002, Washington, DC
As part of a collaborative
effort between further and higher education leaders in the United States
and the United Kingdom, the British Council USA facilitated the establishment
of a UK/US Policy Forum to discuss key issues surrounding lifelong learning.
The forum, consisting of representatives from the British Council USA,
the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE), the UK FE sector,
the American Association of Community Colleges (AACC) and the Education
Commission of the States (ECS), met for the second time in February. Discussions
focused on Workforce Development and Work-based Learning including:
· US &
UK Policy for workforce development (WFD)/work-based learning (WBL)
· Funding for WFD/WBL including industry view and input to funding
· Credit recognition and portability
In addition, there
were representatives from the Department of Education and Skills, the
US Department of Labor, the US Department of Education, the US State Department,
Educational Testing Service (ETS) and the Morino Institute.
A report is currently being compiled. For further information please contact
Jenny Scott at jenny.scott@us.britishcouncil.org
For More Information
If there are any topics you would like to see covered in future editions
of the Update, please contact: alison.corbett@us.britishcouncil.org
Education Research Officer
Additional contacts
jenny.scott@us.britishcouncil.org
Director Education, British Council USA
judith.grant@worldnet.att.net
Consultant to the British Embassy
andy.mackay@us.britishcouncil.org
Director, British Council USA
sue.owen@fco.gov.uk Counsellor
Economic, British Embassy
john.russell@fco.gov.uk Labour
Officer, British Embassy
British Embassy website; www.britainUSA.com
To add or remove a
name from the distribution list, please email alison.corbett@us.britishcouncil.org
|