|
US Education Update
Issue 18 –
July 2003
Contents
Schools
Vocational
and Higher Education
Upcoming
Events/Conferences
Browse or Search the Archives
For more information
Schools
Early
Childhood Education: Head Start Reforms
Head Start, the federally-funded
programme established in the 1960s, serves almost one million disadvantaged
pre-school children and their families. The programme is scheduled for
reauthorisation this year and the current administration has taken a strong
reform stance – with expected opposition.
Traditionally, Head
Start focuses on the social and emotional development of 3-5 year olds
with an emphasis on good nutrition and health care. President Bush, following
on from his No Child Left Behind legislation, seeks to expand the focus
to more teaching of literacy and maths, saying “The new civil right
in America is reading”. He is also introducing a level of accountability,
which has not previously existed. In return for continuation of funding,
Head Start programmes will be required to show, using simple evaluations,
that their children have reached a certain understanding in reading and
maths.
Head Start teachers
are also receiving additional training. So far, over 3,000 teachers have
taken part in the Strategic Teacher Education Program (STEP) to learn
a curriculum known as the Circle Program. These teachers are expected
to train their colleagues – there are 50,000 Head Start teachers
overall. Critics of this scheme would prefer to attract more qualified
teachers with better pay.
The reform measures
have provoked criticism from Head Start officials who are against the
emphasis on academics and accountability at a young age. There is also
criticism of the administration’s plans to reform the funding stream
by giving block grants to states rather then the current method of federal
funding going straight to local partnerships. It is feared that, rather
than increasing flexibility of spending by the states on Head Start, the
funding may be siphoned to other areas.
It is also proposed
that Head Start will come under the joint auspices of the Department of
Education and its current administrator, the Department of Health and
Human Services, signaling the push in its academic focus.
For more information,
visit the Department of Health and Human Services, Head Start information:
www2.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/hsb
Laptop
Initiative for Middle School Students in Maine
The Maine Learning
Technology Initiative was launched in September 2002. Maine became the
first state to provide a laptop computer to each of its 17,000 7th Graders
(13 year olds).
Early indications
are that the project is successful. A mid-year evaluation by the University
of Southern Maine showed that the students were more engaged in their
work, doing more homework and there was less bad behaviour (another report
indicated decreased truancy). The risks associated with computer use,
such as plagiarism, have been low.
The Initiative is
largely supported in the state with plans to expand the scheme to include
8th Graders in spite of a significant state budget shortfall.
For more information:
www.britishcouncil-usa.org/policy/edup/edupus15.html#11
– Background from a previous US Education Update
www.state.me.us/mlte/
- Maine Learning Technology Initiative
(Source: Christian
Science Monitor, 16/6/03)
School Voucher
News
School vouchers programmes
(publicly funded scholarships for low-income, high-achieving students
enabling them to transfer to private, often religious, schools) continue
to gain momentum.
Colorado passed a
pilot state-wide voucher bill in April (the first state since the Supreme
Court’s landmark ruling that Cleveland’s voucher programme
was not unconstitutional last July). Florida is the only other state which
operates a voucher programme in more than one city. Texas has a similar
bill in the works.
Washington DC Mayor
and DC’s school board President have recently reversed their stance
and now support an experimental voucher programme in the nation’s
capital. If passed, it would provide up to $7,500 each year to a low-income
child to offset fees at a private school.
Improving
Parental Involvement in Schools
The benefits of positive
parental involvement in schools are widely accepted. According to the
National Coalition for Parental Involvement in Education when families
and schools work together: students do better in school and in life; parents
become empowered; teacher morale improves; schools get better; and communities
grow stronger (www.ncpie.org).
Many states are now looking at ways of improving parental involvement
with meaningful programmes integrated into the school’s community,
especially in areas with high minority populations.
The National Network
of Partnership Schools, based at Johns Hopkins University, has developed
a framework of six types of parental involvement which schools can use
to help guide their efforts:
- Help families
with parenting and child-rearing skills;
- Communicate with
families about school programmes and student progress and needs;
- Work to improve
recruitment, training, and schedules to involve families as volunteers
in school activities;
- Encourage families
to be involved in learning activities at home;
- Include parents
as participants in important school decisions; and
- Coordinate with
businesses and agencies to provide resources and services for families,
students, and the community (www.csos.jhu.edu/p2000/program2.htm)
State Examples:
Rhode Island
Parent Information Network (RIPIN) provides information,
education, training, and assistance to parents, and works with families,
schools, and
providers, with the goal of improving behaviour and academic achievement.
Organisations can
apply for funding under the Parental Information and Resource Center (PIRC)
programme administered by the Office of Innovation and Improvement (OII)
of the US Department of Education.
Activities undertaken
by the RIPIN PIRC include the development and expansion of home-school
partnerships and the development of training programmes,
materials, and website resources to inform parents about educational issues.
Major objectives of
the RIPIN PIRC include:
- Implementation
of effective parental involvement strategies that will lead to improvements
in student achievement;
- Implementation
of activities designed to raise parents' awareness of education issues;
- Implementation
of early childhood parental involvement activities designed to enhance
children's development and school readiness; and
- Developing and
strengthening partnerships between parents and schools to better meet
the educational needs of children and, in particular, to improve literacy
and prevent violence.
A school district
in Maryland is actively recruiting parents to be involved
in schools with an aggressive outreach programme aimed at recent immigrants.
It has issued culturally-specific booklets explaining the functions of
such topics as Parent Teacher Associations.
In Virginia,
one school district is holding monthly breakfast meeting with free babysitting
and a school district in Delaware has instituted a series
of monthly workshops for parents and caregivers known as the Parents Academy.
The topics cover areas from preparing your child for school to getting
your child ready for college.
For more information:
www.ripin.org –
Rhode Island Parent Information Network
www.ed.gov/offices/OII/portfolio/pirc.html
- Parental Information and Resource Center
www.apposchooldistrict.com/workshops/workshops.cfm
– Parents Academy
18 Month
Anniversary of No Child Left Behind
The US Secretary of
Education recently gave Congress an update on implementation of the No
Child Left Behind Act to mark its 18 month anniversary. Every state, plus
the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, has submitted accountability
plans which have been approved. The administration will now focus on “helping
states place a highly qualified teacher in every classroom; expanding
the opportunities for qualified students to receive tutoring and other
supplemental services; and identifying schools in need of improvement
and making sure they are getting the assistance they need to get back
on track.”
States have been praised
for providing a plan at relatively short notice showing how they will
meet the demands of the NCLB Act. However, some education specialists
have noted examples of states having lowered their testing standards in
an effort to avoid large numbers of their schools being labelled in need
of improvement. Schools which do not improve over time also face federal
financial penalties.
Federal officials
disagree with the assertion that the law encourages states to lower their
standards in order to avoid sanctions. They say that there are enough
checks in place to safeguard standards while allowing states some flexibility.
(Source: New York
Times, 22/5/03)
Community
Action Guide to Teacher Quality
The Public Education
Network has issued a guide which is designed to help communities better
understand teachers and teaching, as well as the community’s role
in achieving high-quality teaching. It is based on the experiences of
eight local education funds (LEFs) (independent community-based advocacy
organisations working to improve public schools and build citizen support
for quality public education in low-income communities). The guide offers
step-by-step procedures on the use of data to assess teacher quality,
on ways to create school and community environments that support teacher
quality, and on ways to engage the community in support of teacher quality.
Read “A Community
Action Guide to Teacher Quality” here www.publiceducation.org/tqguide.asp
(Source: PEN Weekly
Newsblast, 6/6/03)
Vocational
and Higher Education
Supreme Court
Rules on Affirmative Action
On June 23, in a 5-4
vote, the Supreme Court upheld the prestigious University of Michigan’s
use of race as a factor in determining admission to its graduate law school.
However, in a 6-3 vote, the justices ruled that the University’s
use of a point system favouring “under-represented minorities”
for undergraduate admission is unconstitutional. It was viewed as tantamount
to a quota system, which is not permissible under the Constitution. (For
background to this story, see the previous US
Education Update)
The ruling will most
affect competitive universities which struggle to achieve a diverse student
body on campus. They must now ensure that their admissions policies relating
to ethnic minorities cannot be construed as a quota system of any kind.
One of the justices
wrote that she expected that “25 years from now the use of racial
preferences will no longer be necessary…”. Some policymakers
have replied that, unless more is done to tackle the widening achievement
gap between white children and their minority peers at an early age, some
form of affirmative action will be necessary for a long time.
For more information:
www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/06/20030623.html
– White House press release on Supreme Court’s rulings
www.umich.edu/news
– comments from University of Michigan’s leaders
www.cir-usa.org -
Center for Individual Rights, a legal-advocacy organisation which challenged
the University of Michigan’s admissions policies
Update on
Sevis: Tracking System for Overseas Students
According to a report
from the Inspector General of the US Department of Justice the central
tracking system of overseas students, known as Sevis, is experiencing
“significant deficiencies” in its implementation. Sevis (Student
and Exchange Visitor Information System) is a central database to which
all accredited institutions must report the address, field of study, and
attendance of all their overseas students and scholars (either by hand
typing or linking from their own computer database).
Although supported
by most institutions, many have complained that the project was instituted
before it was operational. The problems are primarily technical and institutions
are now facing their busiest season as they try to adhere to the requirements
of an additional one million records to be entered on Sevis before the
August 1 deadline. Concerns over visa delays and chaos for students are
being monitored by NAFSA: Association of International Educators.
For background information,
see previous US
Education Update
Progress
of Workforce Investment Act Reauthorisation
The House of Representatives
passed the Workforce Reinvestment and Adult Education Act on May 8. The
bill, which reauthorises the Workforce Investment Act, would combine currently
separate funding streams, eliminate burdensome reporting requirements,
and make significant changes to youth programmes. The American Association
of Community Colleges will advocate for a greater emphasis on training
as the Senate begins to consider WIA reauthorisation.
Further information
is available on the AACC websitewww.aacc.nche.edu
Community
College Leadership Initiative
The W.K. Kellogg Foundation
has awarded the American Association of Community Colleges (AACC) $1.9
million to begin the development of a comprehensive national leadership
development programme for the nation’s community colleges. The two-year
planning grant, Leading Forward, will help address an anticipated 45%
turnover of community college CEOs by 2007, with a particular emphasis
on helping colleges transform leadership positions to meet the diverse
needs of an evolving community college population.
For more information,
please see the AACC press release at: www.aacc.nche.edu
Future Leaders
Institute
Five UK college deputy
principals will join their US counterparts at the Future Leaders Institute
(FLI) - a 5-day programme, which will take place in Pittsburgh PA, 20-24
July 2003. Dr Craig Thomson, Principal of Glenrothes College in Scotland
will also form part of the tutor team. This new initiative for potential
college presidents (principals) will focus on the development of generic
college leadership skills and knowledge and will cover such issues as:
- College mission,
values and vision
- Assessing leadership
styles and qualities
- Diversity and inclusion
- Building, sustaining
and motivating teams
- Managing conflict
- Balancing global
and local perspectives
The inclusion of UK
participants in this first FLI is part of a collaborative venture between
the British Council, AACC, the Learning and Skills Development Agency
(LSDA), Further Education National Training Organisation (FENTO) and the
Association of Scottish Colleges (ASC). The FLI will provide a unique
opportunity for potential college leaders in the UK and USA to work together
and learn from each other.
This collaboration
has arisen in response to the need for effective leadership succession
planning for colleges in both the UK and the USA and it is hoped that
a more comprehensive programme of joint development between UK and US
college leaders will emerge from this project.
Participants in the
program will be eligible to receive support from the Kellogg Foundation
grant to the AACC and UK participants will also receive support from the
British Council USA.
Further information
is available on the British
Council USA website.
Upcoming
Events/Conferences
November 17-21,
2003
International Education Week
The US Secretary of
Education announced International Education Week 2003 “as a time
to celebrate the diversity of America and the many different cultures,
languages and traditions that make up our global community.”
For general information
about international education activities and programs at the US Department
of Education, click here
www.ed.gov/international.
February 14-17, 2004
Orlando, Florida
CCID 27th Annual Conference
(Community Colleges for International Development, Inc)
“Community Colleges in the World – Including the Excluded”
For more information, visit the CCID website at ccid.kirkwood.cc.ia.us
Browse and
Search the Archives
Now you can browse
through archived issues and at the British
Council USA’s Education Policy section.
For more
information
If there are any topics
you would like to see covered in future editions of the Update, please
contact: alison.corbett@us.britishcouncil.org
Education Research Officer
Additional
Contacts
Judith.grant@worldnet.att.net;
judith.grant@dfes.gsi.gov.uk, Consultant to the British Embassy
Jenny.scott@us.britishcouncil.org,
Director Education, British Council USA
Andy.mackay@us.britishcouncil.org,
Director, British Council USA
Jmckenney@aacc.nche.edu,
Jim McKenney, Director of Economic Development, American Association of
Community Colleges
Alex.Gibbs@fco.gov.uk, Counsellor
Economic, British Embassy, USA
John.Russell@fco.gov.uk,
Labour Officer, British Embassy, USA
British Embassy, USA
website: www.britainUSA.com
American Association of Community Colleges: www.aacc.nche.edu
To add or remove a
name from the distribution list, please email alison.corbett@us.britishcouncil.org
|