US
Education Update
Issue
7, March 2001
Contents
Early Childhood
Education: What the Research Tells Us
The National Association
of Child Advocates has issued a brief, "Making Investments in Young
Children: What the Research on Early Care and Education Tells Us",
which discusses research in this field and implications for policymakers.
The brief outlines significant research from the past decade all of which
tends to point to the need for quality, especially for less advantaged
children. Furthermore, it outlines factors which define quality in relation
to early care and education.
The brief can be downloaded from the publications section of www.childadvocacy.org.
Monitoring
School Quality
The National Center
for Education Statistics has issued a report aimed at helping policymakers
and researchers understand what is known about the quality of US schools
in relation to student learning. The report focuses on three areas and
thirteen indicators within those areas: school context - school leadership,
goals, professional community, discipline, academic environment; teachers
- teacher academic skills, teaching assignment, teacher experience, professional
development; classrooms - course content, pedagogy, technology, class
size. Monitoring School Quality:
An Indicators Report can be downloaded at: nces.ed.gov/pubs2001/2001030.pdf
Business
Coalition Launches Campaign to Improve Teacher Quality
The National Alliance
of Business, the National Alliance of Manufacturers, the Business Roundtable
and the US Chamber of Commerce have jointly launched a new campaign to
draw attention to teacher quality. The report, Investing in Teaching,
calls for a number of strategies including: higher entry level standards
for trainee teachers; new professional development opportunities; competitive
salaries based on job performance. The report is the result of a year-long
evaluation by the four business groups. They talked with educators, officials
from teacher training colleges and other business leaders. The report
cites examples of states where some of their recommendations are already
in place such as the performance-based pay policy in Cincinnati, Ohio,
public schools. The business groups plan to lobby policymakers at both
state and federal level. It is thought that the participation of business
leaders will add momentum to the teacher reform movement in the way that
business involvement played a significant role in the push for standards
reform in schools.
The report can be downloaded at the website of the National Alliance of
Business: www.nab.com.
For more information:
www.brt.org - The Business
Roundtable
www.nam.org - National
Alliance of Manufacturers
www.uschamber.org
- US Chamber of Commerce
www.wcer.wisc.edu
- Consortium for Policy Research in Education at the University of Wisconsin-Madison,
information on their Teacher Compensation project including the Cincinnati
Teacher Evaluation and Compensation System
Sources: Education
Week; Chronicle of Higher Education
Reality
Check 2001: annual survey
Reality Check 2001
is the fourth annual report of the standards-based reform movement from
the perspective of its key stakeholders: students, teachers, parents,
employers, and college professors. The survey was carried out as a joint
project of the newspaper Education Week, and the non-partisan, non-profit
research organisation, Public Agenda.
The findings of the
2001 edition mark a noticeable change from previous ones suggesting that
the reform movement is finally being felt in the classroom. More parents
report that their children must pass a standardised test in order to progress
while teachers say there is less social promotion (promoting students
to the next grade on the basis of age rather than what they know). Most
respondents support the use of standardised testing but also feel that
it should not be the sole factor ensuring graduation or grade promotion.
Teachers view tests as a good yardstick for assessing a student's progress
but believe schools or teachers are not necessarily to blame if a student
fails. The majority of teachers fear that introducing more tests will
lead to their "teaching to the test" in the future - but few
feel that this is a current problem. Students themselves are supportive
of the tests with 80% responding that they seem fair and few complaining
that there are too many. On the issue of technology, most students responded
that they carry out serious learning using computers while most teachers
are satisfied with their ability to use computers effectively as a teaching
tool.
The only note of real
dissatisfaction, as in previous years, came from employers and college
professors who feel young people do not come to the work place or place
of higher learning equipped with basic academic or organisational skills.
To read more about this survey, go to: www.publicagenda.org
School-to-Work
Programmes Take Stock
A national conference
entitled "What Do We Know About School-to-Work: Research and Practice"
was held at the end of the year to evaluate the achievements, or otherwise,
of the programme introduced by then President Clinton in 1994. The legislation
granted funding to states to encourage local businesses to offer job shadowing
or internship opportunities to school students . Federal funding for School-to-Work
(STW) is due to end in October 2001.
Key points from presenters
at the conference:
- STW has positive
impact on students formerly at risk of dropping out
- STW has positive
impact on minority students; participating students tend to take more
maths or science classes than non-participating peers
- Critics point to
examples of states where STW has no clear agenda or link to classroom-based
learning
- Supporters say
major challenge is persuading parents, students and educators that STW
can be a positive tool in school improvement at a time when standards-based
reform dominates
A report, School-to-Work: Making a Difference in Education, released in
early February by the Institute for Education and the Economy at Teachers
College, Columbia University, echoes some of the positive findings of
the above conference. The report, the most comprehensive gathering of
information so far, looks at 100 studies of STW programmes. It concludes
that students involved in STW are less likely to drop out and are better
prepared for college. It also shows that STW programmes have the support
of teachers and local business leaders.
The report highlights
the career academies model in particular. Career academies, the first
of which was established 30 years ago, are typically schools within schools.
Students stay with the same group of teachers for 2-4 years in a smaller
learning environment which integrates both an academic and occupational
curriculum, theme-based around a particular career. The curriculum includes
partnerships with local employers. There are 1500 career academies in
the USA.
Copies of the report can be downloaded from: www.tc.columbia.edu/~iee/
For more information:
www.stw.ed.gov -
US Department of Education's School-to-Work Gateway
www.temple.edu/lss
- Mid-Atlantic Laboratory for Student Success, Temple University which
co-sponsored the above conference
www.philsch.k12.pa.us/osess/edforemp/ed_employ.html
- Education for Employment office, Philadelphia, which participated in
the above conference
www.mdrc.org/Reports2000/CareerAcademies/CA-ExSum-2-4-00.htm
- information on career academies from the Manpower Demonstration Research
Corporation
University
of California May Abolish Use of SAT in Admissions
The President of the
University of California, Richard C Atkinson, is proposing to abolish
the use of SAT scores as an admission requirement to his university system.
Scores from the SAT, a national standardised test, are used by 90% of
admissions offices at four-year institutions. The test was established
by the College Board and is administered by the Educational Testing Service.
(For background on the SAT, please see Education Update 3, item 8: SAT
Tests and College Admission.)
The most common critics
of the test point to research which shows a race and gender gap in scores:
non-white student s and women generally score lower. Atkinson is criticising
the test on the basis that it is an "aptitude" test which does
not reflect what a student has learned. His plan would continue the use
of the SAT II, which tests knowledge of subjects such as English, maths,
science, for admission purposes. He also calls for a more "holistic"
approach to admissions. Supporters of the SAT say that it is the only
national test which cuts across state lines and should be used as part
of an overall admissions process.
Coming from the leader
of one of the largest, and perhaps best, public university systems in
the USA, the proposal (which has yet to be passed by the University of
California) is likely to spark debate throughout higher education on appropriate
tests for admission to college - especially at a time when schools are
moving towards more testing and accountability.
Sources: Los Angeles
Times, New York Times
Higher Education
Report Card
The National Center
for Public Policy and Higher Education has published the first ever state-by-state
report card on higher education (this includes both public and private
2-year and 4-year institutions). The report compares the performance of
each state in five key areas: preparation for college; participation;
affordability; completion of college; and benefits to the state of its
college graduates. The producers of the report view it as an invaluable
measuring stick for states to see how they fit into the national picture
and how they currently serve their residents.
Since the contributing
data are from 1998, the report card includes an article highlighting states
which have since implemented policy changes likely to raise their scores
in the future editions of the report card (planned for 2002 and 2004).
All states received an "incomplete" grade for the data on student
learning at college. This is explained by the lack of common benchmarks
for a meaningful comparison between states.
The report, Measuring
Up 2000: The State-by-State Report Card for Higher Education, can
be downloaded from: measuringup2000.highereducation.org/
Back
Issues
Previous issues of
the Education Update are available on the British Council's USA website.
For More Information
If there are any topics you would like to see covered in future editions
of the Update, please contact: alison.corbett@us.britishcouncil.org
Education Research Officer
Additional contacts
jenny.scott@us.britishcouncil.org
Director Education, British Council USA
judith.grant@worldnet.att.net
Consultant to the British Embassy
andy.mackay@us.britishcouncil.org
Director, British Council USA
sue.owen@fco.gov.uk Counsellor
Economic, British Embassy
john.russell@fco.gov.uk Labour
Officer, British Embassy
British Embassy website; www.britainUSA.com
To add or remove a
name from the distribution list, please email alison.corbett@us.britishcouncil.org
|