US
Education Update
Issue
9, June 2001
Contents
Summary of Senate Education Bill
The Senate has passed,
by an overwhelming margin (91 to 8) the first major overhaul of US education
for nearly 35 years. After only seven weeks of debate this decisive vote
takes the President's top priority a step closer to enactment. A House/Senate
conference will now be set up to reconcile the differences between the
House and Senate bills. But since the bills core packages are virtually
identical, Congress is expected to agree a final bill version by the end
of August.
The main highlights
of the senate bill includes:
Annual State Tests
States would be required to conduct state wide tests in reading and maths
every year for pupils in grades 3 all the way through to grade 8 (ages
7 to 13 approx.), and once during high school.
First Year Review
After one year schools, where test scores do not reach an acceptable and
agreed standard, would qualify for extra federal aid in order to achieve
improvement, but the US Department of Education would require such schools
to change the curriculum and undertake teacher training.
Second Year Review
If a failing school does not make sufficient progress at the second year
review stage, it must make the necessary arrangement to allow students
to transfer to other better performing public schools.
Third Year Review
After three years, students remaining in these under-achieving schools
would be given access to federal Title 1 funds for tutoring or travel
to another public school, but not for private school tuition. However,
tuition could be provided by a suitable parochial school.
Failing Schools
Failing schools (i.e. those who have been unable to turn in an improved
performance) would be required to change the teaching staff, fundamentally
restructure or turn over the operation from the school district to the
State.
Federal Funds
States and school districts would be granted spending flexibility of federal
education money in return for agreeing to annual testing. These funds,
which amount to about 7% of public education funds, will, it is hoped,
encourage improvement and innovation.
The only major disappointment
of the Bush initiative is the failure to win support for school vouchers.
The initiative, designed to help low-income children escape from failing
public schools by enrolling in private ones, failed to win support in
either the House or the Senate.
The Senate version
of the Education bill reflects months of successful negotiations by the
Bush Administration to largely get all they wanted. Democrats also claimed
that they too achieved their goals by adding in new and increased spending
on items such as improvements to education for disabled and disadvantaged
children, libraries, technological centres and mentors for teachers.
Philosophically both
the House and Senate versions are very close so congressional staffers
believe that eventual passage of the Bill is virtually assured, probably
by the Labor Day holiday.
Brief Comparison
of the House and Senate Education Bills
Funding
Senate Bill: Would authorise an $11.5 billion increase in funding
under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) for a total of
about $30 billion in fiscal year 2002. The increase includes $6.4 billion
in Title I funding to assist low-income schoolchildren.
House Bill: Would authorise a $5 billion increase in ESEA funding
in fiscal 2002 for a total of $23 billion. Title I funding would double
over five years, reaching $17.2 billion by fiscal 2006.
Testing
Senate Bill: Would require annual State reading and maths tests
for pupils in grades 3 to 8 (i.e. ages 7 to 13 approx) . Scores would
be checked against a second round of national tests developed by the National
Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).
House Bill: Would also require annual State reading and maths tests
for students in grades 3 through 8. However scores could be checked either
against NAEP tests or another test that the State could choose.
Accountability
Senate Bill: Schools where students' scores do not improve would
initially receive extra federal aid but eventually would have to let pupils
transfer. Test scores would be broken down by race, ethnicity, gender,
income, migrant status, English-speaking skills and disabilities.
House Bill: Schools where students' scores do not improve would
initially receive extra federal aid but eventually would have to let pupils
transfer. Test scores would be broken down by groups similar to those
in the Senate bill.
School Choice
Senate Bill: Students in failing public schools would be able to
use Title I money to transfer to another public school or pay for private
tutoring but could not use voucher money to attend private school.
House Bill: Same provision.
Flexibility
Senate Bill: A "Straight A's" demonstration program would allow
seven states and 25 school districts to use federal block-grant funds
for virtually any educational purpose as long as student performance improves.
House Bill: No comparable provision. However, States and school
districts would have the flexibility to shift half their federal education
funds between different programs.
Special Education
Senate Bill: Would authorise $8.8 billion in fiscal 2002 and $181
billion over 10 years to cover 40% of special education costs incurred
by states and school districts.
House Bill: No comparable provision.
Class Size Reduction
Senate Bill: Would make a programme to hire 100,000 new teachers
part of a block grant that contains funds for other teacher quality programmes.
House Bill: Same provision.
Iowa
Teacher Pay-for-Performance Plan
Iowa is the first
state to propose replacing its traditional teacher salary plan with one
that rewards classroom performance, and student improvement, with higher
pay. The measure, expected to pass the Iowa legislature, will begin in
2003 but will be piloted in six schools from autumn 2001. The traditional
plan pays teachers according to the number of years of service and level
of qualifications such as higher degrees (which do not have to be directly
related to the subject taught). The proposed plan will evaluate teachers
on eight standards (such as classroom discipline, and knowledge of the
subject being taught). Novice teachers will be placed on a "four-step
career path" with the first stage involving an induction programme
and a mentor for the first couple of years. New teachers will be expected
to complete the next three stages within three years. Teachers will then
undergo a comprehensive evaluation at least every five years. Supporters
of the plan hope that the potential to reach a higher salary more quickly
will attract a pool of young talent to teaching in the state -and high
quality teachers mean higher achieving students. Critics of the proposal
worry that other parts of the education budget will suffer to meet the
large costs of the plan (ESTIMATED AT?). Representatives of the local
teaching union feel that teachers will lose out financially: the onus
of comprehensive reviews on administrators will result in a slow system
of compensation.
For background on
research on teacher pay plans, and information on the district-wide model
currently in place in Cincinnati, Ohio, please see previous Updates: Education
Update 2, item 1; Education Update 4, item 1 respectively
www.britishcouncil-usa.org/education/edupdate.html
Source: Education
Week
Pre-Teaching
Academies
Across the USA school
districts have set up programmes to encourage high and middle school students
(young people aged between 14 and 18 approximately) to try out teaching.
One of these programmes is in the Bronx, New York at the Walton-Lehman
Pre-Teaching Academy. Students in the pre-teaching academy are given after-school
and Saturday training in teaching techniques after which they move on
to an internship as a co-teacher which includes teaching whole classes.
The pre-teaching students continue their own studies towards high school
graduation - their internships are in addition to normal studies. They
receive a stipend - $400 for the first semester (term) and $500 for the
second.
Initially seen by
fellow students as "teachers' pets" and by teachers as an additional
burden, interns are now so much a part of the culture that any early prejudices
have vanished. Benefits to staff include greater sharing of good practice.
For example, pre-teachers will move from class to class picking up strategies
from different teachers and applying these as they go along. Teachers
normally isolated from the work of their colleagues can see new strategies
in action and adopt them or modify what they are currently doing. Benefits
to students have included increased confidence, increased respect for
the teaching profession and a lowering of drop-out rates. An interesting
bonus has been the development of a teaching manual aimed at the pre-teachers/their
mentors which has been so effective that it is now on sale. Currently
around 25% of their pre-teachers go on to become teachers.
For more information,
contact: judith.grant@worldnet.att.net
Report
on Texas School Reform
A report from the
Business Roundtable looks at ten years of school reform policies in Texas
and concludes that they have been, for the most part, successful. In particular,
the report says that minority and low-income children have benefited from
the reforms. In brief, the report states that Texas has enforced high
expectations for all students, held schools accountable to the same overall
standard, and kept standards within reasonable reach while raising the
bar slowly. Texas was the first state to report results broken down by
race, income and ethnicity with the same targets for each group. (Statistics
from national assessments in writing and maths show Texas having the highest
average scores for African-American students in the nation.) According
to the report, higher scores have not come at the cost of higher drop-out
rates (although this is disputed by critics as dependent on the way enrollment
is measured).
The full report, "Real
Results, Remaining Challenges: The Story of Texas Education Reform"
can be downloaded from the Business Roundtable site: www.brtable.org
Source: Education
Week
Accountability
- value-added assessment
Bill Sanders, formerly
of the University of Tennessee, has developed a system for measuring the
performance of school students and teachers. For assessing students, the
system looks at gains made by individual students; students' performance
is compared to their own past performance. This allows schools to demonstrate
success even where their results may not be at the higher end of any league
table. It can also expose those schools which are showing good exam results
but where there is no improvement. Sanders-based research has concluded
that teachers are a greater influence on student achievement than socio-economic
factors.
For more information,
contact: judith.grant@worldnet.att.net
Suburban
Experiment with Smaller Schools
School districts in
New York, Chicago and Philadelphia have led the way in creating smaller
school environments to help stem the rise of violence, anonymity and apathy
in large urban schools. In contrast, the middle-class suburban district
of West Clermont, Ohio, is experimenting with breaking up its two large
high schools into 3-5 "themed" schools. The high schools are
not failing - they enjoy a good graduation rate and average test scores
- but the perceived "mediocrity" is enough to make the school
district look to change. Studies on smaller schools suggest that students
play truant less, drop out less, bond more with their teachers, and have
a better sense of belonging. The effect on achievement is less clear although
studies suggest that students from low-income families tend to perform
better in smaller schools. Teachers, students, parents and community members
are all involved in the design of the new schools in West Clermont - students
will choose which one they will attend in 2002. For the schools to succeed,
researchers emphasise that size is not enough - focused teaching and curriculum
must be in place, especially as one disadvantage of a smaller environment
can be the loss of a wider curriculum available at larger high schools.
Information on the ongoing development of the small school design at West
Clermont district can be found at: www.westcler.k12.oh.us
For more information:
www.phila.k12.pa.us/Children_Achieving/exec_summary.html
- Children Achieving is a reform movement based in Philadelphia supporting
the creation of small schools
www.ed.gov/offices/OESE/SLCP/overview.html
- information on the Smaller Learning Communities initiative at the US
Department of Education
www.smallschoolsworkshop.org/index.html
- Small Schools Workshop at the University of Illinois has a list of research
publications on the effects of smaller schools
Source: part of a
special Education Week series "High School: The Shifting Mission"
which can be read in full under "Special Reports" at:
www.edweek.org
Additional
Findings on Class Size Research
Updated findings from
Project STAR (Student-Teacher Achievement Ratio), an ambitious class-size
experiment undertaken by the state of Tennessee in the 1980s have been
published by Columbia University's Teachers College. As part of Project
STAR, primary school pupils were randomly assigned to either a small class
(13-17 children), a regular class (22-26) or a regular class with a teacher's
aide. Previous publications from the study affirm that the students in
the small class performed at a higher academic level, especially minority
children. This publication looks at academic achievement in kindergarten
through third grade (5-8 years old) and the effects of class size related
to the number of years participating in that environment. It also looks
at the long-term effect of smaller classes. The study of data concludes
that previous publications may have understated the academic gains of
smaller classes. It also suggests that earlier participation in a small
class (from kindergarten), for at least three years, results in a greater
academic gain. The gains were smaller when students were later to join
a small class. The results also indicate that the presence of a teacher's
aide in the classroom does not have a significant effect on students'
academic achievement - suggesting that it is a small class that counts
rather than pupil to teacher ratio.
The full article can be read at the online publication of Columbia University's
Teachers College: www.tcrecord.org
(search under "class size" to pull up the article, "The
Enduring Effects of Small Classes".
An Alternative
to Class Size Reduction
Denver, Colorado, is taking advantage of flexibility in federal funding
to offer schools the choice of hiring a full-time teacher (and thus reduce
class size) or hire a "primary lead teacher" . A PLT is an experienced
teacher who works with all the teachers in a school to teach "best
practice" teaching techniques. Rather than hiring more teachers,
the Denver school district is aiming to make its current teaching force
better. Schools that have worked with a PLT report success, although schools
that reduced class size also attest to improved student achievement. The
model of using a PLT may become more commonplace with President Bush's
plan to absorb the Class Size Reduction funding into more general "teacher
quality" grants to allow local school districts more flexibility
in their spending.
Source: Education
Week
The
Virtual High School
Based in Concord,
Massachusetts, the Virtual High School (run by The Concord Consortium)
offers 155 one-semester (term) courses to 2800 high school students in
32 states. Each teacher at the high school has a "class" of
20 and lessons are taught/assignments received over the Web. Virtual High
School classes are in addition to normal school work and, with time-zone
differences, little is done in real time (except for some Web-based discussions).
The Virtual High School teachers are full-time staff at normal schools.
The Concord Consortium estimates that it takes one and a half to three
times more time to do virtual classes compared to face-to-face. The teacher's
role is to prepare lessons, check assignments, stimulate discussion, monitor
progress etc. Any student who is "silent" during discussions
or is late with an assignment will be followed up. As classes are relatively
small and all work is easily retrievable by name/time/mark etc, it is
hard for a student's performance to go unnoticed.
To enrol on a virtual
course students must attend a school which has signed up to the Virtual
High School (and paid a fee). There are currently no cases of students
doing this solo. At the beginning of a course each class is introduced
over the Web - usually with a short biography and a photograph. Students
and teachers can post genuine photos of themselves or post, for example,
a cartoon; students can also go by a nickname thus making it possible
for little or nothing to be known about their ethnicity, gender, looks
etc. As well as a Virtual High School teacher all students have a mentor
in their actual school.
What's in it for students?
According to the Concord Consortium: greater access to a wider range of
courses, lots of hands-on IT work, the chance to collaborate online with
peers in other locations/cultures, and working outside the traditional
classroom. In addition, it allows students to choose their own pace, it
helps them to develop the skills needed for independent as well as collaborative
learning (a lifelong skill) and it is egalitarian (the anonymity the Web
provides can produce a more level playing field for shy, self-conscious
or less confident students. It is also colour/disability blind). Finally
(and perhaps surprisingly) the students develop an intimacy with their
teachers which means they feel far from isolated.
For the teachers,
feedback suggests they feel part of a community of teachers with far more
collaboration and peer support than would be usual across most schools.
The teachers work in teams on projects and have space to communicate with
each other. Their work is peer-reviewed and evidence so far shows that
this environment is seen as a safe one. Most virtual teachers are older
and well qualified, apparently going into this as a means of personal
and professional development. To date no teachers or students at the Virtual
High School have met other than over the Web.
For more information, contact: judith.grant@worldnet.att.net.
To visit the Virtual High School, go to: vhs.concord.org.
Virtual Universities
List Update
The Instructional Telecommunications Council maintains a regularly updated
list of virtual universities in the USA. There are now at least 35 virtual
universities (or state organisations promoting distance education).
The list, which aims to foster better communications between virtual institutions,
has links to all its members: www.itcnetwork.org/virtualalliancelist.htm
Technology
Counts 2001
Education Week has
released its fourth annual report on the state of technology in US schools.
The report focuses on the digital divide that persists in schools. Although
there has been some improvement in access to technology (the ratio of
students to computers in the nation's poorest schools is slightly higher
than the national average of 4.9:1), the report suggests that certain
groups do not enjoy equal access to learning via technology (poor children,
minority children, girls, students with disabilities, students learning
English as a second language, children in rural areas). The findings also
emphasise that the technology is only as good as the programme which surrounds
it.
The report includes a guide to each state's progress in using technology
in the classroom. "Technology Counts 2001: The New Divides"
can be read at: www.edweek.org/tc01
In an effort to close
the digital divide, a group of non-profit organisations has come together
to provide a directory on where to get free access to computers and the
Internet during the summer holidays. The project is aimed at low-income
teenagers who do not have access at home. The directory, ConnectNet, lists
mostly libraries and some community technology centres. A Spanish version
has been published and the service is advertised to teens through television.
For more information, see www.connectnet.org
or www.digitaldividenetwork.org
Silicon
Valley - growing its own workforce
The employers of Silicon
Valley resolved some years ago to narrow the gap between the skills of
its school students and the needs of the high-performance organisations
based there. Currently only 53% of Silicon Valley young people go on to
further or higher education and as many as 40% drop out within the first
year.
Silicon Valley employers
(with the kind of names you would recognise from the label on your laptop)
concluded that a systematic change in education was needed - to be known
as "school-to-work". Run by Workforce Silicon Valley (WSV, a
not-for-profit organisation), the aim is to develop a world class workforce
by mobilising all parts of the community including leaders in industry
and education. WSV is working at a number of levels including a leadership
institute for teachers to provide in-depth training in integrated and
applied curricula; school-to-career programmes across both high schools
and community colleges; implementing a school-to-work curriculum in high
schools; career awareness for middle-school students; and sponsoring teachers
for fellowships in high-performance firms.
WSV recognises there
is no "magic bullet" and has therefore focussed on a set of
integrated objectives, one of which is to develop industry-specific Learning
Collaboratives in which employers and educators together define curriculum
and set student performance standards.
Success so far? There
is increasing employer involvement, for example in the form of job-shadowing
(literally thousands of) opportunities and high-tech prizes for the student
winners of a range of competitions linked to WSV aims. Funding initially
came solely from local corporations and foundations but from 1996 WSV
received a $4m five-year federal grant - the largest such grant awarded
in California.
For more information,
contact: judith.grant@worldnet.att.net
MIT
Course Materials on the World Wide Web
The Massachusetts
Institute of Technology (MIT) announced in April that nearly all of its
course materials would be freely available on the Web. MIT aims to reinforce
"the concept that ideas are best viewed as the common property of
us all". Prior to this, the Institute had collaborated on distance
learning with Singapore, using real-time teleconferencing, video tapes
and faculty exchanges, and a form of distance learning for students actually
on-campus.
Two years ago MIT
put their freshman (first year) physics course online. The project, known
as PIVOT, contains digitised lectures, textbooks and an engine to simulate
certain problems. There is also an intelligent agent which can intervene
when a student makes a problem-solving mistake, "understand"
what concept has been misunderstood and suggest which part of the text
book the student should review. PIVOT has proven popular for a number
of reasons - students can study at their own pace, it is not tied to one
faculty member or the schedule of a faculty member, and it can accommodate
individual learning styles. Not yet formally evaluated, early observations
show that PIVOT students do at least as well as traditional ones. Anecdotal
evidence is that one benefit might be that any unconscious elements of
racism/sexism are reduced. Another benefit predicted is that the need
for huge lecture halls will reduce. PIVOT has not supplanted traditional
teaching methods - the students are free to attend lectures and/or to
do the digitised version; they are also free to submit course work in
person. PIVOT is seen as an adjunctive resource rather than a replacement
for traditional human-focussed methods. A query remains about what will
be the role of the lecturer/professor if PIVOT-style methods are more
widely adopted. However, MIT does not envision a rise in anti-social behaviour
or student isolation resulting from additional online study on-campus.
For more information,
contact: judith.grant@worldnet.att.net
Back
Issues
Previous issues of
the Education Update are available on the British Council's USA website.
For More Information
If there are any topics you would like to see covered in future editions
of the Update, please contact: alison.corbett@us.britishcouncil.org
Education Research Officer
Additional contacts
jenny.scott@us.britishcouncil.org
Director Education, British Council USA
judith.grant@worldnet.att.net
Consultant to the British Embassy
andy.mackay@us.britishcouncil.org
Director, British Council USA
sue.owen@fco.gov.uk Counsellor
Economic, British Embassy
john.russell@fco.gov.uk Labour
Officer, British Embassy
British Embassy website; www.britainUSA.com
To add or remove a
name from the distribution list, please email alison.corbett@us.britishcouncil.org
|